【任鋒】待束縛的先知與被重一包養構的傳統 ——在現代脈絡中辨識錢穆

Modern history since the reaction of Xinhai,After more than a hundred years of excitement and accumulation, it has become a small tradition. We will commemorate Teacher Mu tomorrow. This little tradition is a real condition that cannot be removed – it is an existence state that cannot be removed even if you want to. In this language, how do you think of new scholars like Momo who seem to have a strong sense of disagreement or alienation towards modern reactionary politics and religion? This reminds me of some of the most historically insightful articles in Momo’s works. For example, in 1971, “The Responsibilities of Chinese Intellectuals”. That was a review of the 60th anniversary of the Xinhai Rebellion and a painful investigation of the modern republic for 60 years, which conveyed the sad feelings of Xinhai Republic during the Xinhai Republic. There are also some similar articles, including essays, systems or fragmented world articles covering thirty, forty, or even seventy years of the Republic, all have strong historical penetration—all in the modern new world circle since 1911, discussing how to recognize tradition, civilization, and Chinese people.

In this meaning, Momo’s reply to tomorrow (in essence, it is our reply to Master Momo’s teacher), or perhaps saying that Momo’s reply after a long period of death is not to create a certain kind of old master. The concept of meaning is not to establish a certain academic account. It is not to say that it is to pass the money reading teacher Mu, to bring us back a vision of modern politics and religion from the beginning, and to remind those areas where modernity in China is not covered by the sky. In the great vision of modern founding, we should look at everything and examine ourselves – both the chief teacher and the examination of itself and the times, or perhaps a goal worth seeking.

1. The difference between contemporary characters and traditional characters

In “Discussing the Disadvantages of Current Learning Styles”, Teacher Mo proposed the division between “contemporary characters” and “academic characters”, or perhaps “modern characters” and “traditional characters”. Which characters just dominate the world in the times, and when the tide of the wind changes, the voice of the sound disappears? Which characters can be called or said to eventually become traditional and academic characters, which may not be obvious at that time, and will have a more continuous and positive impact on history? The chief teacher of the money teacher agrees with the latter. There are some interesting sayings about this area, such as some teachers of the times, some academics, some secularists, and some traditionalists; however, since the 1911 reaction, there have been no major teachers. The words of the Chief Money Teacher are thought-provoking. Now our teachers respect the Chief Money Teacher as a master of Chinese students. But the money teacher said we did not have any major teachers this time. In this article, he has profound criticisms of Kang Youwei, Zhang Taiyan, Liang Qichao, and Hu Xingsheng, these people of the times – in fact, Liang Ren’s private ownership finallyDialogues that are both clear and obscure in life (maybe they can also include Zhang Taiyan and Zhang Xueyan), and at the same time, it is confirmed that Ke Shaoyin, Sun Tae-ling, and Wang Xiansheng are considered to be considered traditional characters. When we earn first when we evaluate the price, we need to pay attention to what the evaluation standard he cares more about. When Moe Mu treats characters, he puts him in the times and in the tradition.

Why is this main thing? Because it is not difficult for us to evaluate characters only in the times or in the tradition – the second one seems to be more seen in the second place in the Master Money Master; Master Money Master told us very actively that when evaluating a person, it depends on his digestion of the problems of the times and how he can integrate this digestion into the inheritance and rebirth of the tradition. Only by doing this can we become traditional characters, not only the era of chasing the waves and the trend is always popular. In that article, the head teacher retorted what real characters are, what real era is, and what real tradition is, and followed these questions to tell what real learning is and what real reaction is. Especially the reaction problem, his “true reaction” reminds us to analyze the truth. Those who are “sick” and those who are quickly decay can each suffer for three to five years, and turn their eyes into smoke. Although it is real, it may not be true. We should be cognizant in the reincarnation of the traditional flow, and the head teacher advocates adhering to the first and wait for the last, and we focus on this.

My teacher, Mr. Mu, gradually returned to the public’s vision in the mid-1980s—whether it was Bashu Book Club that introduced his works such as “New Interpretation of the Discourse”, or “National Daily” to excerpt his “Looking at the Bingyin New Year’s Times”. He gradually became a master’s understanding in the field of thinking and academics. Of course, this kind of understanding lies in the energy and the atmosphere of the era since the 1980s. In the 1980s, the trend of the trend of the chief teacher and the teacher’s statement on civilization has attracted more attention; in the 1990s, the chief teacher and the teacher was regarded as a master of the national school and is well known. Over the past thirty years, Mo Yan discussed Ye Qiu’s eyes and opened his eyes, rubbed his sun acupoint, and watched the changes of several personal chats on the stage. Mo Yan returned to experience civilized and national enthusiasm. Compared with the past ten years, the teachers gradually interpreted and read from the perspective of political thinking. So, the atmosphere of the divergent era will affect our understanding of him. In the development of the times, with the continuous changes in the world where we live and the themes of the times, we should remind and open up the multiple ideas that Mr. Mu himself has to adjust himself to approach him and to help him.

In the past thirty years, the discussions about the money-Mr. Teacher Mu, whose eyes or values ​​are the criteria for having these aspects: for example, whether he is a neo-Confucianism; then from this argument, the distinction between history and philosophy is drawn out – we understand that Master Master has listed him as the four historians of the 20th century; the other ones are masters of the Chinese, or even a little bit called civilized scholar. These signs or